South West Bikers | Motorcycle Forum

ridenut wrote:Are you reading the posts ?

He said quite clearly that the post was a generalisation and implied it wasn't aimed at me.

Just look back you plank.

I'm just asking for a definite yes or no

Um, yeah, I read the posts and he said that he BELIEVED it was a general statement - go on fella - scroll back up and take a look.

As he was not the author of the original post he can not definitively confirm nor deny whether the post was aimed at you now can he, moron?!

Lady G wrote:As he was not the author of the original post he can not definitively confirm nor deny whether the post was aimed at you now can he, moron?!

So how do you explain this, you plank

billinom8s wrote:Yes a statement of fact no not aimed at you.

ridenut wrote:

Lady G wrote:As he was not the author of the original post he can not definitively confirm nor deny whether the post was aimed at you now can he, moron?!

So how do you explain this, you plank

billinom8s wrote:Yes a statement of fact no not aimed at you.

Yes, but do you have any proof?

Ridenut/andyals/Stately ...

Why is it so important to you to stay somewhere that you are not liked and your opions are not valued? I really don't understand your mindset .

ridenut wrote:So how do you explain this, you plank

billinom8s wrote:Yes a statement of fact no not aimed at you.

Because the answer he gave you which you quoted above was in answer to the question you posed - quoted below - where you asked what his belief was..

billinom8s wrote:

ridenut wrote:

billinom8s wrote:I believe the comment above was a statement, nowhere on the post is an individual mentioned. It was a general comment on internet trolls.

So just to confirm then, that you do not believe that the post was aimed specifically at me, and was a generalisation.

Yes or No.

Yes a statement of fact no not aimed at you. Why would it be aimed at you ? What kind of person would make verbal attacks and slanderous comments about persons they do not know ?

Numpty.

You stated quite clearly that he couldn't answer my question because he was not the author of the post.

Lady G wrote:As he was not the author of the original post he can not definitively confirm nor deny whether the post was aimed at you now can he, moron?!

But as we see, he did in fact definitely confirm that the remark was not aimed at me, so you were wrong.

ridenut wrote:You stated quite clearly that he couldn't answer my question because he was not the author of the post.

Lady G wrote:As he was not the author of the original post he can not definitively confirm nor deny whether the post was aimed at you now can he, moron?!

But as we see, he did in fact definitely confirm that the remark was not aimed at me, so you were wrong.

Nope, he stated definitively that his belief was that it was not aimed at you. So you are wrong. Nah nah ne nah nah.

Tsk, you're such a child.

Lady G wrote:

ridenut wrote:You stated quite clearly that he couldn't answer my question because he was not the author of the post.

Lady G wrote:As he was not the author of the original post he can not definitively confirm nor deny whether the post was aimed at you now can he, moron?!

But as we see, he did in fact definitely confirm that the remark was not aimed at me, so you were wrong.

Nope, he stated definitively that his belief was that it was not aimed at you. So you are wrong. Nah nah ne nah nah.

Tsk, you're such a child.

Erm no.

billinom8s wrote:Yes a statement of fact no not aimed at you.

That's a definite NO, NOT AIMED AT ME.

No doubt about it.

I disagree. But you could always get your solicitor to look it over and send me a letter...

i wish i knew where the lame muppet that was stanley,ridenut.arsemunch lived .
i have a a shiny 'humane kiler' that i'm guessing would destroy his/her small brain in one go.
please let me have a o.............i promisae i will be gentle

Lady G wrote:I disagree. But you could always get your solicitor to look it over and send me a letter...

What part of "NO, NOT AIMED AT YOU" are you unclear about

What part aren't you clear about?

bambam you should know violence isnt the answer, it would be mcu more fun and prolonged by beating him with daffodils

i could be mistaken tho. Especially as i do not know the author. He could have written it for you. I do not know. He may of been being polite, not wanting to call you all manner of verbs accompanied by many, many adjectives or vice versa. Some of which may have involved your mother and various kitchen implements, but like i said, i do not know. I only spoke on my interpretation of what was written. Sorry if this may have confused or mislead you.

billinom8s wrote:I only spoke on my interpretation of what was written. Sorry if this may have confused or mislead you.

I only asked for your interpretation.

You stated quite clearly that you did not believe that the remark was made against me.

Glad to hear it.

Or maybe now you think it was, and I wasn't being ridiculous by assuming so.

Are you now saying I was right, and the insult was aimed directly at me ?

Stop dithering and make up your mind ffs