South West Bikers | Motorcycle Forum

Ah well, justice seems to have been done, looks like ya boys gonna do time.

YESSSSS -- RESULT :--

"A police officer has been found guilty of causing the death of a 16-year-old schoolgirl by dangerous driving.

Pc John Dougal, 41, had accelerated to 94mph (151km/h) in a 30mph zone before he hit Hayley Adamson in Newcastle in May, the city's crown court heard.

A police driving expert told the court that the patrol officer's speed was unjustified, but Dougal had claimed he had been driving safely.

Northumbria Police said it accepted responsibility for Hayley's death.

The car's siren and lights had not been activated at the time, the jury heard.

Following the conviction, Judge David Hodson said a prison sentence was inevitable. "

2 weeks no doubt

God rest her soul...

Heard on the radio tonight there was a computer error in the policemans car, So the car number plate it picked up on was fine anyway.


Rip to the little girl.

As my view is very known on this topic I wont pass any comment.


Only thing I will add. RIP to the young girl

mmm...most important issue being lost again!!!...waste of a young life...R.I.P. and god rest her soul

scorpion wrote:mmm...most important issue being lost again!!!...waste of a young life...R.I.P. and god rest her soul

Not from me, Just saying what i heard on the radio.

I wont be commenting on this anymore like blue i`ve said my piece.

Think we all know who moves the issues on postings these days....bit quiet aint he...as ya Thai bride landed from ebay Standy

I think that the sad thing is, this "accident" would have happened even if the driver wasn't travelling so fast, and had his sirens on.

The girl had probably been drinking, which would have played a part.

Stately wrote:I think that the sad thing is, this "accident" would have happened even if the driver wasn't travelling so fast, and had his sirens on.

The girl had probably been drinking, which would have played a part.

Funny that, I don't think anyone on this site would expect anything less from you.

DaveMcR1 wrote:

Stately wrote:I think that the sad thing is, this "accident" would have happened even if the driver wasn't travelling so fast, and had his sirens on.

The girl had probably been drinking, which would have played a part.

Funny that, I don't think anyone on this site would expect anything less from you.

I'm just stating fact

Stately wrote:

DaveMcR1 wrote:

Stately wrote:I think that the sad thing is, this "accident" would have happened even if the driver wasn't travelling so fast, and had his sirens on.

The girl had probably been drinking, which would have played a part.

Funny that, I don't think anyone on this site would expect anything less from you.

I'm just stating fact

"Probably" is not a fact. I also believe a jury is in a far better position to judge than you or do you want to argue & insult them as well?

Stately wrote:

DaveMcR1 wrote:

Stately wrote:I think that the sad thing is, this "accident" would have happened even if the driver wasn't travelling so fast, and had his sirens on.

The girl had probably been drinking, which would have played a part.

Funny that, I don't think anyone on this site would expect anything less from you.

I'm just stating fact

where is the evidence for this fact - prove it or retract it !

billinom8s wrote:The girl had probably
where is the evidence for this fact - prove it or retract it !

"The court also heard Hayley had been drinking alcohol that night, which may have affected her decision-making and that it was notoriously difficult to judge traffic speed, especially at night".

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... ights.html