Yey, brrrm, uh oh, ouch
Posted: May 3rd, '16, 10:28
http://www.itv.com/news/london/2016-05- ... to-a-tree/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
South West Bikers | Motorcycle Forum
The UK Based Forum for Bikers in the South West
http://www.southwestbikers.com/
Yey, brrrm, uh oh, ouch
Page 1 of 1
Re: Yey, brrrm, uh oh, ouch
Posted: May 3rd, '16, 13:43
Errr.....co ck
Re: Yey, brrrm, uh oh, ouch
Posted: May 3rd, '16, 13:56
Oh dear, I can remember my first pint of beer as well ! 
Re: Yey, brrrm, uh oh, ouch
Posted: May 3rd, '16, 15:27
How much does one of those cost then? ;)
Re: Yey, brrrm, uh oh, ouch
Posted: May 3rd, '16, 17:32
In the report it said
£215,000
£215,000
Re: Yey, brrrm, uh oh, ouch
Posted: May 3rd, '16, 20:29
I think that may have been the wrong car for that driver
Re: Yey, brrrm, uh oh, ouch
Posted: May 3rd, '16, 21:32
W@@@@@@@@NKER!!!!!!! 
Re: Yey, brrrm, uh oh, ouch
Posted: May 3rd, '16, 22:09
billinom8s wrote:In the report it said £215,000
Yeah, but the insurance is only £149 fully comp with no xs
Re: Yey, brrrm, uh oh, ouch
Posted: May 5th, '16, 07:57
So you are saying £215k pounds to buy a toy for speed.
That Car £215k pounds 0-60 -3 seconds, top speed 204mph - £0 pounds change
BMW S1000RR £15k pounds 0-60-3 seconds, top speed 188mph - £200k pounds change
£200k pounds for extra 16mph
That Car £215k pounds 0-60 -3 seconds, top speed 204mph - £0 pounds change
BMW S1000RR £15k pounds 0-60-3 seconds, top speed 188mph - £200k pounds change
£200k pounds for extra 16mph
Mandolin wrote:Oh dear, I can remember my first pint of beer as well !
Re: Yey, brrrm, uh oh, ouch
Posted: May 5th, '16, 11:56
not sure I'd want that driver loose on the roads on a S1000RR thoughBelladonna wrote:So you are saying £215k pounds to buy a toy for speed.
That Car £215k pounds 0-60 -3 seconds, top speed 204mph - £0 pounds change
BMW S1000RR £15k pounds 0-60-3 seconds, top speed 188mph - £200k pounds change
£200k pounds for extra 16mph
.................. Re: Yey, brrrm, uh oh, ouch
Posted: May 6th, '16, 06:57
It would be seriously sad to see....this stunning bike wrapped around the treebadgerKDD wrote:not sure I'd want that driver loose on the roads on a S1000RR thoughBelladonna wrote:So you are saying £215k pounds to buy a toy for speed.
That Car £215k pounds 0-60 -3 seconds, top speed 204mph - £0 pounds change
BMW S1000RR £15k pounds 0-60-3 seconds, top speed 188mph - £200k pounds change
£200k pounds for extra 16mph
...just imagine 
;)Re: Yey, brrrm, uh oh, ouch
Posted: May 6th, '16, 21:46
Ducati 1299. Does it all a second quicker than the BMW because its red which is better so its faster and it wins. And its got two pistons and less metal so its good for the environment and stuff. Ride big lairy twins, go faster and save the planet. Yeah.Belladonna wrote:So you are saying £215k pounds to buy a toy for speed.
That Car £215k pounds 0-60 -3 seconds, top speed 204mph - £0 pounds change
BMW S1000RR £15k pounds 0-60-3 seconds, top speed 188mph - £200k pounds change
£200k pounds for extra 16mph
Mandolin wrote:Oh dear, I can remember my first pint of beer as well !
