Funky wrote:Personally I feel in these situations, if the track and noise levels were there before the residents were then the residents have no right to sue.
My thoughts exactly. This sh1t happens all the time, people move next to Westlands in Yeovil then complain about the helicopter noise. I read in the paper last year about some bloke who bought a holiday home in a village in Somerset for the weekends, then attempted to sue the church because of it's bells on a Sunday morning. WTF?
This country is so [Censored] up with political correctness; when it gets to court the judge should ask the retards why they bought a house next to a [Censored] race track, and what exactly did they think was going to be happening there? Then they should be fined for wasting the courts time and for being fucktards.
The only person I can possibly imagine they should be allowed to sue should be the solicitor that carried out their searches before they bought the house for not warning them that they were moving next to a race track and therefore it would be noisey - however, I suspect if the solicitor was any good he probably DID warn them, but they moved there anyway, which is probably why they sued the track and not him. In which case it should never have even been allowed to get as far as court.
W.ANKERS
[img]http://i273.photobucket.com/albums/jj219/fireblade1301/Bladerunner.jpg[/img][img]http://i273.photobucket.com/albums/jj219/fireblade1301/bladerunner1.jpg[/img][img]http://i273.photobucket.com/albums/jj219/fireblade1301/bladerunner2.jpg[/img]